About

This web site is Tamara Adlin's blog about design, user experience, and building customer relationships—and the silly things companies do to their customers.

Tamara Adlin is a strategist, consultant, designer, and partner at Fell Swoop LLC. Send her a note at: tamara [at] fellswoop [dot] com

RSS Feed
Wednesday
Sep162009

Ummm...what question are you trying to answer?

The other day we were meeting with a prospective client (who will remain nameless, but let’s give them a nickname shall we? Let’s call them Acme.) During our ‘getting to know you’ meeting, we were looking at some of the UIs on their current products. The execs at Acme are fully aware that their current UIs aren’t working so well.

How do they know? Well, first of all, it’s pretty clear if you just look at them. It’s almost impossible to figure out what they are, to say nothing of how on earth to use them. Also, their current customers keep coming back to them asking ‘why can’t I do X with your product?’ Hence, they called us (and when I say us, I’m talking about Fell Swoop, dontcha know).

So there we were, staring up at the projection screen, at a seriously sad and confusing UI. And the Acme exec asked “how would you help us avoid this?” I thought for a minute. I thought about all the fancy stuff I know about user experience and customer-centricity and testing and metrics and wireframes. And then I realized that the answer was much more basic:

“Well, first of all, we’d want to figure out what question this thing is supposed to answer.”

Guess what? That simple sentence became the foundation for the rest of the meeting. Back to basics indeed…but basic waters run deep. In order to figure out what question something is supposed to answer, you have to figure out:

  1. Who’s asking (personas)
  2. How they are phrasing the question (and whether that’s even the right question to ask)
  3. What answers they expect (how the personas think, vs how you think)
  4. How your company and products can answer that question in a truly fabulous and unique way (business goals, value propositions, and differentiators),
  5. What you want your customers to do in addition to getting the question answered (like buy more question-answering-devices)
  6. Then, and only then, how to translate all this into a UI that actually works.

I think the problem is that most people start talking at #6. And that’s not where the answer is. It’s not about moving text and boxes and buttons around.

Long story short, apparently, after our meeting, the Acme folks went around muttering ‘what question is it supposed to answer? What question is it supposed to answer?’ and there have already been some pretty great results. For example, they told us that they asked a customer what he thought a particular product was supposed to answer. Guess what. The customer thought the product was supposed to answer question X, and it was actually built to answer question Y. Horrifying, yet also magical, because now that Acme can see the problem, they can fix it.

 
Thursday
May142009

I'm going to be on Oprah tomorrow.

Well. That's kinda sorta a tiny bit of an exaggeration. But here's the deal: I volunteered to help the Seattle Humane Society (SHS) redesign their website last year. Oprah is doing a show on 'amazing animals' and her producers called a few weeks ago and told SHS that they had been selected to be one of 15 shelters nationwide to have an animal highlighted on tomorrow's show.

So how does this have anything to do with me? Well, here's what happened, according to my peeps at the shelter:

"I asked them how they picked us to be one of the 15 shelters – out of the thousands of shelters in the United States – and the producer told me he was searching the internet for the humane societies and SPCAs in major cities and we came up at the top of one of his searches!"

Hi, how's THAT for ROI. "We redesigned the site, and Oprah called."

Here's the before shot:

 

And, of course, the after. Please note, I helped them. I didn't do the redesign. There are still plenty of opportunities here.

Tuesday
May122009

I am...the Geek of the Week!

Ahh, giddy heights of technical and professional success, how I have scaled thee! I now breathe the rarified air shared only by the social outcasts of yesteryear, basking in their tenuous re-startup glows. That's right America, Planet Earth, yea the very Solar System...I am the Seattle PI's Geek of the Week.

You get to see me in my Haute Trash outfit, made entirely of ethernet and phone cords, and learn all about my little...proclivities. For example, I've managed to out myself as someone interested in Rabbit Agility.

The lops kill me. I mean really.

 

Monday
May042009

Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz Drops F-Bomb. Tamara Wonders if Bartz is Long-Lost Soul Sister. 

You know how I feel about bad words at work. Well, clearly, I am having a significant influence on the corporate world at large.

Carol Bartz is the new CEO of Yahoo and she held her first earnings call recently. And, bless her heart, she dropped the F-bomb...while talking about things near and dear to my heart. Here's the quote from the Techcrunch article by Erick Shonfeld:

.... Later on she did manage to drop the F-word, though (but quickly apologized for the slip). The exact quote, said at the end of the Q&A in frustration over all the layers of extra management at Yahoo, was:

'There were engineers in almost every country, and way too many product people. We had one product management person for every three engineers. We had a lot of people telling engineers what to do but nobody fucking doing anything. Excuse me. I knew that would slip out one of these times.'

And that was just her second conference call as Yahoo CEO.

Carol Bartz, CEO of Yahoo. And curser.

Carol Bartz, CEO of Yahoo. Bless her *#*$%! heart.

I love this quote. And I love how much this situation irks her, given that it is a totally irksome situation. Being an engineer must suck so often: they get all these people telling them to do different things, changing their minds, playing politics, being bossy...it must be like being an electrician hired to update the wiring at the Brady house and being supervised by all six kids. And the dog. And Alice.

And then they get to build stuff they know isn't as good as it could be. And then they get blamed.

Now here's where I take issue with Mz. Bartz. This snippet is from a CNET article entitled Bartz lights fire under Yahoo engineers:

We have good engineers but have to hire more and get them focused on the right stuff. It's probably the most important thing Yahoo's going to do to really become a big strong growing international company," Bartz said during a conference call to discuss the company's lackluster first-quarter results.

Ummm...hold on a sec. That's like solving the problem at the Brady residence by sending in more electricians. If I had 10 seconds with Carol in an elevator, I'd say "Love ya mean it. BUT you best figure out the 'get them focused' part before you hire a bunch more engineers. Don't do the Brady electrician thing."

At which point she would be likely to call security, but I betcha she'd wake up in the middle of the night thinking I was totally right.

You know, it seems to me that engineers should be the closest allies to user-centered design people. Oh, and executives should keep one of us around at all times. Basically, we're trying to help everyone get out from under the whims of Peter and Cindy and help them find the time, clarity, and focus to build kick-ass software.

They key is to find the common language between UX people and engineers (and execs). And help them see that the 'soft' stuff we do is actually really truly helpful when it comes to untangling confusion -- and that we can be the translators between engineer-ese and executive-ese. But guess what...it's our job to help them understand that we can help. Not theirs to just 'get it.'

I think this is one of the reasons I was so psyched to see the MSDN article! By engineers, for engineers...and about the value of basic UX methods. Gotta love 'em.

And gotta love Bartz. I'd rather be led any day of the week by someone who gets frustrated enough at stupidness in a corporation to drop the F-bomb than a haircut in a suit. We'll see what she does with Yahoo. I don't envy her the job of untangling a company that gigantic.

Well, actually I kinda do. How fun would it be to try something like that? If being an exec didn't require so many spreadsheets I might actually be interested enough to try it.

Friday
May012009

Looking for Underpants? You are in the right place!

Hello! Yes, this is the new home of the former Corporate Underpants blog. Same great content, more bunnies. I expect to see more comments out of all you guys out there. I expect them to be clever, insightful, and at least 3 words long.

You may begin.